Carried Out With Partners

Digital Archiving & Documentation Operations

Alongside our published investigations, we run a partner-supported digital archiving operation documenting events and potential human rights violations in North Africa and East Asia. Between October 2023 and June 2026, we monitored 246 channels and collected 903 satellite images to process a massive volume of digital evidence.

246
Channels Monitored
903
Satellite Images
253,624
Units Archived
127,858
In-Context Messages (275.26 MB)
26,463
Multimedia Files Extracted
23,159
Bulletins Sent to Data Management System

Of the extracted multimedia: 16,992 JPG images and 9,332 MP4 videos.

For inquiries or to request access to this archive, contact Archive@paxmemoria.org.

The data management system behind these numbers is Engram, the platform Pax Memoria builds and runs on its own servers.

Strategic Purpose & Capacity Building

We do not store geographic information systems (GIS) and multimedia data permanently. Our primary objective is capacity building: working through partners, we act as a bridge, equipping local civil society organizations, human rights groups, and UN agencies with the exact data, analytical tools, data-management practices, and workflows they need to document violations independently.

Narratives Beyond Criminal Justice

We use this archived data to understand "information flow." Our vision extends beyond using evidence solely for criminal justice and legal proceedings — we explore its potential to analyze, understand, and dismantle narratives, helping preserve collective memory and document realities in ways that transcend strict legal frameworks.

Triage with First Look

The archive runs on Engram, our data management platform. Videos and images pass through First Look, a triage tool we are developing: it reads sampled frames with an open image-language model and suggests, with the time in the video, where material may show one of five classes. Every suggestion goes to a review queue where an analyst confirms or rejects it. Nothing is labelled automatically.

Fire

Buildings on fire, flames and thick smoke.

Weapons

Firearms, rocket launchers, heavy machine guns and armed people. The class with the strictest written guideline.

Widespread destruction

Destroyed buildings, rubble after explosions, collapsed neighbourhoods.

Burned vehicles

Burned-out cars and charred vehicles.

Bodies

Possible casualties, so an analyst knows before opening the moment.

On a first sample of 20 videos from this archive, analysts confirmed 34 of 40 suggestions. The review continues class by class, and the numbers say nothing yet about what the model misses.

GIS Integration & Strict Manual Verification

While AI accelerates data processing, the final comparison, verification, and issuance of results are conducted entirely manually. Our team cross-references collected visual media with GIS satellite imagery to confirm geolocations, verify chronologies, and build accurate conclusions free from machine bias.

Case Study

As a practical application of our spatial-analysis capabilities, we used this methodology for a damage assessment of the Syria wildfire. By combining ArcGIS imagery services, Open Data, and Planet Labs satellite imagery with SAM3 and DINOv3 deep-learning models, we rapidly converted a half-dozen point samples into a preliminary damage layer — which was then passed to our team for comprehensive manual review before any final results were issued.